Navigation and Content
You are in  United States of America
or Select a different country
The Logistics Trend Radar 7.0 - Insights. Shaping Tomorrow

Trends Filter

Use the toggles below to filter visible trends.

Focus Areas
Trend Clusters
Sectors
Reset Filters Apply & Close
Trend Header Image

Trend Name

Social & Business Trend
Impact:
Adoption:

Read Full Article

Trend Overview

Show more
Source: Greenhouse Gas Protocol (2013): Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions

Relevance to the Future of Logistics

Carbon Accounting & Tracking

Today, comprehensive accounting of Scope 1, 2, and 3 product emissions (direct, indirect, and upstream and downstream, respectively) remains a challenge. Many businesses, including logistics organizations, do not account for these emissions at all. The ones that do may rely on various secondary sources of carbon calculation with generalized values and assumptions, and often fail to factor in emissions by second-tier and third-tier players. This makes it difficult for B2B and B2C customers to accurately compare and choose suppliers and service providers that meet their environmental standards, especially when evaluating on a product-level basis.

However, steps are being taken to address this customer need. For organizations that currently struggle with carbon accounting, partners like DHL offer carbon calculators, estimates, and externally verified reports. This enables companies to account for Scope 3 emissions from a single shipment across all trade lanes, including data from our third-party service providers.

Transparency holds the key as achieving visibility will likely stimulate compliance across all value chains and sectors. This in turn will ensure dependable comparisons between all players in the supply chain. Part of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), the Partnership for Carbon Transparency (PACT) organization has developed a suitable framework which increases transparency, enables uniform calculation, and allows product-level emissions data to be shared across all value chains and sectors.

Besides that, more regulations and standards are being introduced, contributing to a future global framework for carbon accounting. These include the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol, ISO 14064 standard, and Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) as well as recent regional examples include the EU SFDR and California Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (CCDAA).

In future, more granular data will be obtained. Carbon accounting software platforms like Sage Earth can help companies maintain compliance and accuracy by translating financial data into a measurable carbon footprint. And the use of carbon calculators, estimates, and externally verified reports provides further transparency in carbon accounting and reporting. As sensor technology rapidly permeates the supply chain, it will be possible to accurately calculate and track this at shipment level and even product level. With this sensor data, logistics will not only provide companies with more accurate carbon footprint figures but also identify areas along the supply chain for decarbonization improvements.

Green Laws & Regulations

Greater awareness of climate change is pushing policy makers to do more, and citizens are increasingly supportive of this, although environmental protection measures may raise the cost of living. Logistics organizations should anticipate new regulations, prepare for compliance, and recognize the opportunity for first-mover advantage.

Transportation is profoundly impacted by electrification legislation which is rapidly developing. It incentivizes the production and purchase of electric vehicles (EVs) and in some cases even bans the use of combustion engines. Examples include the US Inflation Reduction Act providing EV incentives, China’s New Energy Vehicle (NEV) mandate ensuring automaker production levels, and the UK’s Road to Zero Strategy cleaning up road transport by 2030.

Another crucial lever in the decarbonization of the supply chain is packaging, given its pollution potential, resource utilization, and carbon footprint. Many regulations aim to minimize harm from non-recycled material leaking into the environment, decrease greenhouse gas emissions associated with packaging functions, and improve the circularity of recycled materials throughout the supply chain.

The EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive sets recovery and recycling targets for packaging waste and encourages minimization of packaging volume and weight, designing for reuse and recycling, and reducing hazardous substances in packaging materials. California’s Rigid Plastic Packaging Container (RPPC) law mandates these containers have recycled post-consumer content, are reusable, or are sourced from recycling programs. In Japan, the Containers and Packaging Recycling Act requires businesses to sort and recycle containers and packaging. Manufacturers and importers of products are responsible for packaging recycling, which promotes the effective use of resources.

Decarbonization is also supported by the rise of zero-emission zones (ZEZs), designated areas restricting or banning vehicles that emit pollutants. These zones help cut emissions, improve air quality, reduce noise, and encourage the use of clean transportation alternatives like electric vehicles, bicycles, and public transport.

Norway’s capital city, Oslo as an example has implemented a car-free zone and aims to achieve a fully electric taxi system by 2024. The city also employs a combination of toll rings and differentiated parking fees based on vehicle emissions. Also, the Californian city of Santa Monica now has a Zero Emission Delivery Zone where electric delivery vehicles, cargo bikes, and walking deliveries are prioritized.

In summary, rules and regulations are increasingly affecting all parts of the supply chain.

Optimizing Operations

As supply chains are responsible for around 60% of global CO2 emissions, there is significant scope for improvement in logistics operations. Logistics organizations need to understand the carbon impact of each facet of their operations as the foundation to drive change and accurately track results.

Available levers to achieve carbon reduction and eventually neutrality include electrification, carbon-neutral building design, and sustainable fuel sources such as liquified natural gas, sustainable aviation and maritime fuels and hydrogen power cells . Logistics organizations can also cut emissions by optimizing the transportation mode mix; shipping via ocean and rail instead of air and truck is more carbon-efficient, if time-to-delivery can be extended.

Measuring the total delivery time travelled and determining optimal routing for last-mile fleets is another way to shrink the carbon footprint. The German software developer Greenplan provides ways to track, measure, and evaluate the carbon impact of logistics activities.

A further way to optimize operations is to ensure logistics facilities are carbon neutral. At DHL, we aim to leverage the latest green technologies to have carbon neutral buildings across our businesses worldwide.

The initial costs of these and other environmentally friendly solutions may be higher than wasteful alternatives. But customers demand greater sustainability in the supply chain. As CO2e emissions become more identifiable, commoditized, and framed as operating costs, logistics players are finding ways to make the necessary investments while also reducing the financial and environmental cost of logistics operations.

Challenges

Challenge 1

Standardized carbon accounting practices are not yet global and legislation continues to develop around emissions and offsetting.

Challenge 2

As it is hard to predict the ramifications of policies and regulations, financial risk is involved in technology and new market selection.

Challenge 3

Inconsistent, generalized, decentralized, and opaque data may be used to calculate product carbon footprints (PCFs) and logistics emissions; this makes it difficult to assess and compare values.

Challenge 4

Decarbonization solutions often require heavy upfront investment and potential implementation downtime.

Challenge 5

Economies of scale in decarbonization solution investments are not yet available to logistics providers, so customers may have to pay more for products and services.

Standardized carbon accounting practices are not yet global and legislation continues to develop around emissions and offsetting.
As it is hard to predict the ramifications of policies and regulations, financial risk is involved in technology and new market selection.
Inconsistent, generalized, decentralized, and opaque data may be used to calculate product carbon footprints (PCFs) and logistics emissions; this makes it difficult to assess and compare values.
Decarbonization solutions often require heavy upfront investment and potential implementation downtime.
Economies of scale in decarbonization solution investments are not yet available to logistics providers, so customers may have to pay more for products and services.

Outlook

The social and regulatory pressure to be carbon neutral or even negative on logistics is stronger today than ever before. More than 4,000 businesses around the world are already working with Science-Based Targets to achieve corporate climate pledges and reduce emissions in line with the Paris Agreement goals.

Given that supply chains lie at the heart of decarbonization conversations and agendas, it is imperative for logistics organizations to make the necessary moves early. Now is the time to adapt to decarbonization changes, ensuring the supply chain operates and delivers effectively in this era of sustainability.

This trend should be ACTIVELY monitored,with use cases in some applications that can already be addressed today.

Need support prioritizing high impact trends for your business?

Request a complimentary Trend Radar Mapping session at your regional DHL Innovation Center and prepare for the future today.

Request a Session

Stay Connected

Sign up for the DHL Innovation Insights newsletter for more trends direct to your inbox.

Yes, sign me up!

Sources

  1. Accenture (2023): How supply chain sustainability helps unlock resilience and growth
  2. DHL (2023): The Report – A retrospective on the Era of Sustainable Logistics