The trend of Exoskeletons involves wearable devices built to support or enhance human physical capabilities. While passive exoskeletons absorb energy from movements and relinquish power when support is needed, active devices are externally powered and can sense and react to specific movements of the human body.
With over 1.7 billion people affected worldwide, musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are one of the most common work-related health issues. Originating from the healthcare and military industries, exoskeletons appeared on the market for industrial use in logistics more than a decade ago, aiming to reduce the occurrence of MSDs in the workplace.
Since then, performance, usability, and comfort of wear have improved in both active and passive industrial exoskeletons. Also, within the last two years, cost has further decreased, with providers standardizing their products and scaling up production.
The exoskeleton market is expected to continue growing; industrial exoskeleton shipments are projected to reach 181 million units in 2030, resulting in US$ 2.2 billion revenue. A 2023 study shows more than half of these products are deployed in the manufacturing sector, and others in construction, the energy sector, agriculture, and mining.
While the trend of Exoskeletons will likely have only minor impact on efficiency gains within supply chain operations, the technology is widely understood to positively impact employee health and safety, leading to higher employee satisfaction and retention rates.
Facing an aging workforce and growing labor shortages, exoskeletons that can reduce physical strain on the human body have become a topic of interest for logistics organizations seeking to limit the particularly high sick leave rates per full-time equivalent (FTE) affecting the industry. In addition, the implementation of exoskeletons in operations could provide differentiation to attract and retain labor.
However, large-scale deployments have yet to be seen. This is mostly because currently available devices typically offer support only for specific sets of movement, limiting their application to niche use cases. Also, proof of efficacy is lacking; there are no long-term studies of large-scale deployments to provide evidence of the expected health and safety-related benefits as well as talent attraction and retention benefits.